
I think the New York Times like the vane for blogs. It always
plays the role that put out a problem. Once New York Times reports something,
there will be a lot of bloggers write and discuss about it. For example, if the
New York Times reports a new policy of Obama, next day, there will be a lot of discussions
about it, like why he propounds the policy, what it will bring to the society,
the benefits and the loss of it, whether it is a good policy in the long run… People
write their own thinking, and some professional person like economists,
politicians, sociologist will explain it with their professional knowledge. In
this way, people can learn many things easily. Bloggers help the common people
learn the policy more clearly, they show the deep meaning which we are hardly
find by ourselves in it. In addition, the blogs like a stretch for the New York
Times. New York Times always reports a piece of news for just one time, it will
quickly be replaced by others next day, but in blogs, you can find a lot follow
reports about it. There will be a lot people still pay attention and focus on
it.
Besides, there will be a lot of
bloggers who are the exact witness or who has the personal experience, so we
can learn the most reality of the news through their blogs. We can see how
different people reflect to same news from different social status or even different
countries. Because different people use different angle, it always very interesting
and can let us think deeply. In my heart, blogs is a stretch in vertical and horizontal
direction. It is a part of the press sphere in the modern time.
No comments:
Post a Comment