

Once upon a time, the way we get news is simplex. At that
time, there was no network, no television, and most of us read newspaper or
listen to radio to get to know the world. The form and technology limited the
content. What the public can know is all recreated by the editors. Just like
Jarvis draws, the editors collect information and sent them to people; the
process is linear. This always leads a lot of problems especially in the
countries which the freedom of the press not be protected very well. The government
can control the news easily. But now the situation is totally different, there
are more ways for people can get information from, and thanks to the new technology,
word is not the only tools people can use to spread news. There are many kinds
of way they can use to collect data and show the result to the public. Press
becomes more plentiful and believable. Like Jarvis writes, the tradition press
now “is replaced today by a press-sphere in which any of many sources can,
thanks to links, add up a story and to fulfilling the need or desire for news
and information.” But I think the problem is too simple, and the she doesn’t explain
the meaning of the overlapping part. I think since she draws these parts, it
must contain some meaning. I think it would be a very interesting thing, but
how Jarvis draws makes me confused, I try to explain by myself, but I give up
in the end. Otherwise, her model expresses the basic situation clearly, after
read that I realize the change of press suddenly. It is true that the press
becomes a press sphere today. When I see a piece of news, I want to see the photos
and videos of it, and the links of the news to other sources become an
indispensable part when I read it.
Besides I would use Facebook, Blogs to see
more relative information about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment